Zimbabwean Businesses Forced To Break Law To Survive

Zimbabwean Businesses Forced To Break Law To Survive

Essential Tools

Finance, Economic Development and Investment Promotion Minister Mthuli Ncube has admitted that some businesses in Zimbabwe must break the law to remain profitable, highlighting a regulatory system that punishes compliance and rewards evasion.

Speaking during the 2025 Mid-Term Budget Review in Parliament on Thursday, Ncube remarked off the cuff that more money was being made outside formal compliance channels. He said:

During the second half of the year, government will be seized with the implementation of business reforms, targeting the reduction of fees and charges as well as regulatory requirements and the number of steps in acquiring licences for example.

This will significantly reduce the operating costs for industry to enable it to compete both domestically and internationally.

We have a situation where in some sectors, players or private players are only profitable if they don’t comply with regulatory requirements.

If they comply, they make losses and that situation needs to be changed. We will lower the cost of doing business.

Ncube announced that the government will be reviewing regulatory fees and charges, bureaucratic procedures, and compliance requirements sector by sector, beginning with agriculture.

He said the agricultural sector would be the first to undergo review, starting within a week or two.

Research by the local fact-checking body, ZimFact, conducted in March, revealed that Zimbabweans pay nearly 50 different taxes, making the country one of the most heavily taxed in the world.

This analysis was based on local tax legislation, including the Finance Act, Income Tax Act, Customs and Excise Act, Capital Gains Tax Act, Value-Added Tax Act, Stamp Duties Act, and Revenue Authority Act.

More: NewsDay

Comments

One response

  1. EIWE

    SOME! The ONLY way to survive is to cut corners on compliance. ACTIONS speak louder than words and the actions we see with tax upon tax upon charge upon licence and uneven application of BV inspections etc etc etc clearly shows that there is no desire for formal business….

    How does one legitimately import a product for example where the minimum charge of BV is something like 250??? That should mean that the minimum value of goods attracting BV is USD250,000 to make it viable on top of duties and other charges etc….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *