Mukupe's Bail Application Pending Appeal Dismissed
Former Finance and Economic Development Deputy Minister, Terrence Mukupe, has been denied bail pending appeal by the High Court following his recent conviction for fuel smuggling in February 2017, reported H-Metro.
Mukupe was among a group of four people jailed for three years in November 2023 after importing over 138 000 litres of diesel into Zimbabwe without paying duty.
The former Harare East MP and his three accomplices had misrepresented the destination of their tankers as the Democratic Republic of Congo to evade payment of duty amounting to approximately US$55 600.
In his application, Mukupe argued that the High Court had misdirected itself on the facts and evidence.
He claimed the court grossly misdirected itself by basing on circumstantial evidence where the inference of guilt was not the only reasonable inference to be drawn from the facts and evidence.
HOT DEALS:
itel A70 - (128GB, 3GB RAM) $89,
itel A70 - (256GB, 4GB RAM) $99
itel P40 (128GB, 4GB), (6000mAh) $99
itel P40 (64GB, 4G), (6000mAh) $93
LATEST:
itel S24 (128GB) $124 (108MP camera)
itel S24 (256GB) $159 (108MP camera)
Cash on Delivery in Harare & Bulawayo. Tinotumira kwamuri inosvika.
WhatsApp: 0783 450 793
However, Justice Benjamin Chikowero dismissed the appeal saying the application was without substance.
Justice Chikowero stated that even though Mukupe did not import the diesel, he unlawfully and intentionally connived to import and dodged payment of duty. He said:
I consider that all the grounds of appeal are without substance. I do not think that there is any real prospect of the court finding differently.
The court explained why Mukupe is caught in the ambit of being an importer and why it was satisfied that he imported the diesel in question.
Further, it must always be borne in mind that even if the court had not found that he did not import the diesel, it still made a finding that he unlawfully and intentionally, therefore, assisted in or was an accessory to or connived in the importation of the diesel without payment of duty thereon.
It is for these reasons that I take the view that the first ground of appeal is frivolous.
The second ground of appeal not only attacks findings of fact, some of which were based on an assessment of the credibility of all those who testified at the trial, but is erroneous.
The conviction was not based solely on circumstantial evidence. It rested on a combination of direct evidence and circumstantial evidence.
Consequently, there is not and can be no substance in the second, being an incorrect ground of appeal.
The judge noted that even if he could be confident Mukupe wouldnât abscond, âeverything else is against himâ.
He failed to tip the scales in his favour. The application for bail pending appeal against conviction and sentence be and is dismissed.
Mukupe and drivers, Sam Kapisoriso, Joseph Taderera and Leonard Mudzuto were convicted and jailed in November last year.
More:Â Pindula News
