HomePolitics

Pangolin did not belong to me, owner is in Mozambique: Zanu-PF MP tells court

6 years agoTue, 25 Jul 2017 16:48:41 GMT
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Pangolin did not belong to me, owner is in Mozambique: Zanu-PF MP tells court

Zanu-PF member of parliament for Nyanga North, Hubert Nyanhongo who appeared in court facing charges of possession of a pangolin and attempting to sell the endangered species attempted to dissociate himself from the pangolin that was discovered in his car saying it was not his. Instead, he blamed a Mozambican national only identified as Kapenga, who he claimed was the owner of the pangolin in question.  He further alleged that Kapenga had disappeared from the scene while Nyanhongo had been arrested. The legislator  told the court:

Your Worship, I am insisting that the pangolin does not belong to us. It belongs to Kapenga, the one we offered a lift while we were in my constituency.

If we are given a chance with the help of police officers we can go and call Kapenga to testify in this court where he got the pangolin.

I know the village where Kapenga stays and if we get the opportunity, we can call him to set us free us in this matter. Your Worship, I am insisting that we never committed this offence and it was the Parks rangers who deliberately allowed Kapenga to escape.

When we were arrested by the rangers, they poked me with an FN rifle on my head and that is when Kapenga vanished from the scene.

HOT DEALS:
itel A70 -
(128GB, 3GB RAM) $89,
itel A70 - (256GB, 4GB RAM) $99
itel P40
(128GB, 4GB), (6000mAh) $99
itel P40
(64GB, 4G), (6000mAh) $93
Cash on Delivery in Harare & Bulawayo. Tinotumira kwamuri inosvika.

WhatsApp: 0783 450 793

This was after Magistrate Gwatidzo had dismissed a defence application to dismiss the case saying:

It cannot be denied that a live pangolin which was in a sack was found in Hubert Nyanhongo’s vehicle as stated by State witnesses who gave corroborating evidence.

According to Section 97 of the Parks and Wildlife Management, it says if anyone found with an animal in his vehicle, he/she is responsible for the animal recovered.

This assertion connects the four accused persons with an offence, therefore your plea for discharge is dismissed

Trial continues.

More: Herald

 

Tags

0 Comments

Leave a Comment


Generate a Whatsapp Message

Buy Phones on Credit.

More Deals
Feedback