UK Proceeds With Eviction Of Asylum Seekers, Takes Them To Rwanda

Britain’s first scheduled flight taking asylum seekers to Rwanda was due to depart on Tuesday, with the government warning that anyone who avoided it through last-minute legal challenges would be put on a later flight anyway.

Foreign Secretary Liz Truss told Sky News:

We are expecting to send the flight later today. I can’t say exactly how many people will be on the flight. But the really important thing is that we establish the principle.

There will be people on this flight and if they’re not on this flight, they will be on the next flight because we are determined to break the model of the appalling people traffickers.

Reuters reports that Britain struck a 120-million-pound ($148 million) deal with Rwanda to send some migrants, who had arrived illegally by crossing the Channel in small boats from Europe, to live in the landlocked African country.

The government says the policy is needed to stem the flow of migrants risking their lives in Channel crossings and smash the people-smuggling networks.

But the plan has horrified political opponents, charities and church leaders who say it is inhumane. The United Nations’ refugee chief called it “catastrophic”, and the entire leadership of the Church of England denounced it as an “immoral policy that shames Britain”.

Prince Charles secretly described the move as appalling.

There are fears that the refugees will likely face human rights violations in Rwanda the same way they were abused in their home countries. 

The policy is being implemented despite reports that Rights groups on Friday urged leaders attending the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) this month to pressure Rwanda to release dissidents and improve its “bad” record on freedom of expression.

UK editor for ITVNews, Paul Brand this Tuesday said he was witnessing that, “as a journalist here in Rwanda, this is not a free country.” He added:

People we have interviewed have already been reported to the government for participating in our reports. Journalists cannot operate freely here, and we are lucky to be international media.

This is part of the concern human rights groups have about the deal with Rwanda. Will asylum seekers sent here be free and safe? Especially given they have often fled repression elsewhere? And who will tell us what is happening to them if Rwandan journalists are gagged?

More: Pindula News is best enjoyed via the App. Download it here