Zimbabwe’s government justified the deployment of the army into the streets, saying it was aimed at guarding against a regime change plot by those pursuing subversive threats against the country.
This was in response to United Kingdom parliamentarian Kate Hoey who on Wednesday,urged her government to suspend re-engagement program with Zimbabwe because of recent human rights violations perpetrated by members of the security forces. Hoey appealed to the international community including the United Nations to speak against military deployment in the streets saying it is against international laws.
However in an exclusive interview with 263Chat, Information, Media and Broadcasting Services Minister Monica Mutsvangwa said the military has been deployed to support the police. Said Mutsvangwa:
There is no undeclared State of Emergency in Zimbabwe. Security concerns are intelligence led some of which cannot be disclosed to the public because of their sensitive nature. When there are joint operations between the Police and the Military, the police leads the command and the military plays a supportive role. Security Operations always reflect the level of the threat. Currently the subversive threat against our country and its institutions has been heightened. There is a serious regime change plot against Zimbabwe and the security forces have to respond in accordance with the level of that threat. As I said to your previous question, deployments and stationing of security apparatus depends on the level of threat. These are not decisions taken lightly. The current security arrangements are in place to safeguard the safety of citizens and property.
Related:
More: 263Chat
The narrative of regime change as a blatant excuse to abuse civilians has been used by Mugabe and ZanuPF for 38 years. Only a government led by clueless men and women can make such ridiculous and stupid claims. The world is watching and the reactions of most nations has been in support of the besieged ordinary citizen. Munangagwa and his cronies have confirmed what we all knew that they deployed the military and police to instill fear and inflict as much damage as possible including death on a defenceless and vulnerable population. History will judge them mercilessly.
The government and ZANU-PF (strictly speaking there should be a difference between these two entities) are paranoid. Their lack of good governance catering for ALL citizens has angered the population. And IF there is a plot for regime change, it does not warrant the brutality meted out to the
alleged activists and nor to innocent people caught up in the mele. Under what legal or moral code can brutality, no recourse to justice, refusal to medical attention and denial of food be considered justified by the authorities and in a country regarded as Christian?