Econet Media Cannot Distribute Kwese TV Satellite Content To Zimbabweans- Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that Econet Media (Mauritius) cannot distribute Kwese TV satellite content to Zimbabwean viewers because it failed to comply with the terms and conditions under which it was granted licence.

This follows the Broadcasting Authority of Zimbabwe’s (BAZ) appeal contesting a High Court decision allowing Econet Media Limited (Mauritius) to distribute Kwese TV satellite content to Zimbabwean viewers.

The High Court had nullified a decision by BAZ cancelling the content distribution licence awarded to Econet Media’s partner, Dr Dish (Pvt) Ltd to provide the service pending confirmation of the provisional order.

More: Herald

Broadcasting Authority of ZimbabweDr DishKwese TV

The Broadcasting Authority of Zimbabwe (BAZ) is the regulatory authority for broadcasting in Zimbabwe. BAZ was established through an Act of Parliament in 2001 providing for the functions, powers and duties of the authority. BAZ falls under the Minister of Media, Information and Publicity. BAZ... Read More About Broadcasting Authority of Zimbabwe

BOSTV Blue Ocean Satellite Television is a free to air satellite TV channel which is 100% Zimbabwean owned.The channel brought back some of the popular South African soapies like Generations, Muvhango, Rhythm City as well as other entertainment, that were lost when South African brodcaster... Read More About Dr Dish

Kwese TV was a subscription-based Zimbabwean satellite and broadcasting network owned by Econet Wireless Zimbabwe, under Econet Media. The service was shut down formally on 1 November 2018. Customers that had bought the satellite could still watch Free to air content on their Kwese equipment... Read More About Kwese TV

Comments

Back to top

One Comment on “Econet Media Cannot Distribute Kwese TV Satellite Content To Zimbabweans- Supreme Court

  1. Provisionally what economic value did the arrangement generate for the Zimbabwe economy as the Zimbabweans put their House in order even as they granted the access initially? More rational or economically sensible is a fine and continuation of service provision while Zimbabwe sorts its folders in the backyard away from the citizens and public who currently benefit from the services in a multiplicity of social and business parameters.

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published.