Reactions to Justice Charles Hungwe’s judgement on the Romeo Taombera Zibani Case Interdicting JSC Interviews

I spent some time studying Justice Hungwe's judgment in the Zibani case. I have never seen a mass of confusion in 16 pages. It's a mess.

— Alex T Magaisa 🇿🇼 (@Wamagaisa) December 14, 2016

Hungwe thinks an intention to amend the Constitution is superior to the Constitution itself. It's an appalling judgment. https://t.co/NvqpJG213S

— Alex T Magaisa 🇿🇼 (@Wamagaisa) December 15, 2016

Hungwe has embarrassed himself BIG TIME. He can't lcean this mess up

— mmatigari (@matigary) December 15, 2016

I am not a lawyer, but clearly an intention to change the constitution does not invalidate current constitution.

— 𝑪𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒐𝒗𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝑲𝒂𝒔𝒖𝒌𝒖 🇿🇼 (@ChinovavaKasuku) December 15, 2016

2/3 Shockingly Justice Hungwe says constitutional provision is unconstitutional due to an INTENTION by Justice Minister to amend provision! pic.twitter.com/Ab3McSqozX

— Prof Jonathan Moyo (@ProfJNMoyo) December 14, 2016

.@ProfJNMoyo 2. No disrespect to Hungwe J, but I feel he fought hard to justify a pre-determined decision. That's a travesty in my opinion

— Kapurura Tapiwa (@TKalerts) December 15, 2016

 

Brig-General Sanyatwe said Chiwenga is a political general. I say Charles Hungwe is a political judge @Wamagaisa @miltonsnr @JessieFMajome

— mmatigari (@matigary) December 15, 2016

@fortunechasi @Madzikita @Wamagaisa @mayor_justice the most contrived & irrational judgement I've ever read,

— Nathan D Ndlovu (@Nate_Esq) December 15, 2016

I am not a lawyer, but clearly an intention to change the constitution does not invalidate current constitution.

— 𝑪𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒐𝒗𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝑲𝒂𝒔𝒖𝒌𝒖 🇿🇼 (@ChinovavaKasuku) December 15, 2016